Sex Bomb in the pool
Apr0120095:15 p.m.
To quote Skye 'Why, oh why, oh why on earth would you want to spend 5hrs swimming in Lake Windermere??! LOL...'.
A: Probably because it is more scenic than spending 5 hours in a pool, lol.
Mind you, todays swim was interesting. I thought I had picked a quiet time between the lunchtime rush and the childrens classes, but I forgot to check out the aqua aerobics timetable. So there I was, attempting to concentrate on my technique while 40 unfit and / or older ladies bounced along to Sex Bomb in the lane next to me.
I have never seen anything like it! It was so funny. Their coordination was... well... non-existant and I spent more time dodging flaying arms and legs that came over or under the lane rope than I did swimming. Although it isn't something I would chose to see every swim, it did make my swim much more interesting as a one off.
But at least they all looked like they were having fun and getting a bit of exericse in. And the rest of the pool was very quiet. I guess nobody else likes Tom Jones.
Oh, nearly forgot to say - 170 lengths (4.25k) done in about 90 min. A combination of freestyle and backstoke using paddles, buckets and kick buoy.
Post views 635
Comments (3)
eclipse 'sorry but my mind just wont grasp it, "170 Lengths"!!!!! I would have drowned long before that, Very impressive Caz. Tel' added 1st Apr 2009
Report as inappropriate
Skye_Trekker 'I'm seriously in awe of the swimming you do Caz. Especially now seeing my feeble attempts to try and learn front crawl are getting me absolutely nowhere. And yes, spending 5hrs in Windemere would be far better than spending the time in the pool!' added 1st Apr 2009
Report as inappropriate
emmteeyess 'Aw -- was expecting you to say you'd SEEN a sex bomb (guy) in the pool, that realy made your swim more interesting. We sometimes forget some people do their exercise for fun, rather than to be slick and good at it - like 170 lengths in 90 mins (how slick and good was that) Cheers, MTS' added 2nd Apr 2009
Report as inappropriate